<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://community.activestate.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>ActiveState Community Site - Red Hat / Fedora Core - Comments</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/os/red-hat-fedora-core</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Red Hat / Fedora Core&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>re: running scripts</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/3106#comment-7331</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How are you running the script, though the Komodo debugger, using the &quot;Tools-&amp;gt;Run Command&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there any exceptions being recorded in Komodo&#039;s log files:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://community.activestate.com/faq/komodo-file-locations#log_files&quot; title=&quot;http://community.activestate.com/faq/komodo-file-locations#log_files&quot;&gt;http://community.activestate.com/faq/komodo-file-locations#log_files&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
Todd&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:18:56 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ToddW</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7331 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>re: mercurial support in Komodo</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/forum-topic/mercurial-support-for-kom#comment-7313</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Komodo does *not* provide any mercurial push/pull support as of yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve logged the following bug so this can be tracked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81110&quot; title=&quot;http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81110&quot;&gt;http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81110&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add yourself to the bug cc-list and you&#039;ll be automatically notified of any progress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
Todd&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:01:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ToddW</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7313 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>what status of this now? as</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/forum-topic/mercurial-support-for-kom#comment-7301</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;what status of this now? as i saw with mercurial i can&#039;t push/pull changes&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:14:47 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>slav0nic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7301 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Setting environment variables in the script</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/3023#comment-7175</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Reposting (paraphrasing) here from an email response in case anyone else is looking at this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SetEnv statements have not succeeded in setting those Perl debugging env vars correctly. You can hardwire these statements at the top of your Perl program:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;push @INC, &#039;/usr/local/Komodo&#039;;&lt;br /&gt;
$ENV{PERLDB_OPTS} = &#039;RemotePort=localhost:9000&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
require &#039;/usr/local/Komodo/perl5db.pl&#039;;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:58:38 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>troyt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7175 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>re: older linux OS</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/3004#comment-7062</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately I don&#039;t believe this can be fixed. Komodo is based upon Mozilla (Firefox) and with the Komodo 5 release, the underlying software has been updated to the recent Mozilla 1.9 (Firefox 3) codebase, which now requires higher versions of Glibc and other libraries:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* GTK+ 2.10 or higher&lt;br /&gt;
* GLib 2.12 or higher&lt;br /&gt;
* Pango 1.14 or higher&lt;br /&gt;
* X.Org 1.0 or higher&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You should still be able to use the older Komodo 4 builds, which are based upon Mozilla 1.8 and as such has lower library requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:09:09 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ToddW</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7062 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Redhat Linux 8.0</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/3004#comment-7026</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have Redhat Linux 8.0 and I get the same message. Can this be resolved?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:36:32 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nsizelove0618</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7026 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fixed this yesterday - please try the nightly</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2921#comment-6853</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We had been hitting this error in testing too. We think we&#039;ve got it solved now. Try the most recent nightly build and let us know how it goes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://downloads.activestate.com/Komodo/nightly/&quot; title=&quot;http://downloads.activestate.com/Komodo/nightly/&quot;&gt;http://downloads.activestate.com/Komodo/nightly/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>troyt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6853 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Right, that&#039;s what I tried</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2925#comment-6846</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Right, that&#039;s what I tried but it didn&#039;t work. Must be some kind of architecture difference between his and my machine. I&#039;m running 64 bit linux and made what appear to be appropriate adjustments but no-go. I&#039;ll look around some more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  Sander&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:00:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nocturnal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6846 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Here&#039;s a helpful reference</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2925#comment-6845</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2006/9/22/inspecting-a-live-ruby-process&quot; title=&quot;http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2006/9/22/inspecting-a-live-ruby-process&quot;&gt;http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2006/9/22/inspecting-a-live-ruby-process&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I haven&#039;t tried it, but Jamis certainly knows his way around Ruby.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:55:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ericp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6845 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The ruby stack trace for</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2925#comment-6842</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The ruby stack trace for each thread and each thread&#039;s state would be handy for example. Of course if the internals are trashed there&#039;s nothing to salvage but there are certainly cases where system calls block and thereby prevent ruby threads from scheduling. In that case ruby&#039;s internals are fine and stack traces would be very helpful to find out which line of code blocked. Think reading from pipes retrieved from popen and getting their status for example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After attaching gdb to such a process I could see the ruby internal stack trace but that doesnt&#039; really tell me which line of my code caused the problem. Apparently it&#039;s possible to call ruby functions to find out but so far I haven&#039;t been able to make that work. Someone with more ruby skills (such as you guys) should have much better luck with that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  Sander&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:38:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nocturnal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6842 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If the Ruby thread scheduler dies, you need a C debugger</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2925#comment-6841</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure what a Ruby debugger that could attach to&lt;br /&gt;
a broken Ruby interpreter could tell you if the&lt;br /&gt;
internals are broken.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:12:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ericp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6841 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks, that will work for</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2925#comment-6829</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, that will work for code that&#039;s prepared in that way. The problem is of course that once the thread scheduler goes South there&#039;s no guarantee that the debugger thread will actually still respond when the socket connection is made.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is possible to connect to a running ruby process using gdb but decyphering what&#039;s going on inside is problematic. It would be great if your product could handle this task.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:07:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nocturnal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6829 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No, but a possible workaround</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2925#comment-6828</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Komodo Ruby debugger can&#039;t attach to a Ruby process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, you could try starting up the debugger at&lt;br /&gt;
runtime if you need it -- this way your process doesn&#039;t&lt;br /&gt;
incur debugger overhead until the debugger starts up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s how, in rough detail:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Start another thread in your process that just opens a&lt;br /&gt;
port and listens on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. When a connection is made, it can start up a remote&lt;br /&gt;
debugging session, following the steps given in the&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Setting a Break in your Ruby Code&quot; in the online Help.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will let you examine the state of your app, and&lt;br /&gt;
you can see all the running threads, and their state.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:16:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ericp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6828 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>VisualDiffer</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2870#comment-6686</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve written &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.activestate.com/node/2482&quot;&gt;VisualDiffer&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It isn&#039;t yet fully feature but should fit your needs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any feedback is very appreciated &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--&lt;br /&gt;
dafi&lt;br /&gt;
Enhance KomodoEdit with &lt;a href=&quot;http://dafizilla.sourceforge.net/morekomodo/index.php&quot;&gt;MoreKomodo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:42:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dafi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6686 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>re: movable tabs</title>
 <link>http://community.activestate.com/node/2864#comment-6681</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is no such functionality provided in Komodo to do this as yet. There has been a feature request to add this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug.cgi?id=36367&quot; title=&quot;http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug.cgi?id=36367&quot;&gt;http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug.cgi?id=36367&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
but it is *not* scheduled to be done in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note: You can modify the Source Tree XUL overlay in order to move it another panel, it will require some XUL extension knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
Todd&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:51:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ToddW</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6681 at http://community.activestate.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
